Works Cited
"An Interview with Christian
Hosoi, Professional Skateboarder/Pastor." Interview by Joel
Rice. The San Francisco Chronicle n.d.: n. pag. Web. 4 Apr.
2014.
<http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/column-3-an-interview-with-christian-hosoi-professional-skateboarderpastor>.
Johns, Helen Woolley Ralph.
"Skateboarding: The City as a Playground." Journal of
Urban Design 6.2 (2001): 211-30. Print.
Lombard, Kara-Jane. "Skate and
Create/skate and Destroy: The Commercial and Governmental
Incorporation of Skateboarding." Continuum 24.4 (2010):
475-88. Print.
Moye, Johnny J., and John M. Ritz.
"Boards on the Move: Surfboards, Skateboards, Snowboards, and
Kiteboards." The Technology Teacher. Resources in
Technology, Nov. 2009. Web. 4 Apr. 2014.
<http%3A%2F%2Feds.a.ebscohost.com%2Feds%2Fpdfviewer%2Fpdfviewer%3Fvid%3D3%26sid%3D64abdf5a-4404-471d-968d-c62dd2bf20ab%2540sessionmgr4005%26hid%3D4103>.
Shannon, Charlenne S., and Tara L.
Werner. "The Opening of a Municipal Skate Park: Exploring the
Influence on Youth Skateboarders’ Experiences." Journal
of Park and Recreation Administration 16.3 (2008): n. pag. Web.
4 Apr. 2014.
This article is a credible source for
my research paper because it shows a Christians perspective of
skateboarding and why it should or should not be restricted. The
authors credentials include dozens of other interviews and separate
articles ranging on topics. Date wise this publication is important
to include because it shows a fairly recent opinion by a recent
professional of the start. The authors main goal in this article is
to inform about the underground culture of skating. The publishing
source for this article generally targets an audience that fits the
following description: anyone interested in insider knowledge and
experiences of a topic. This audience would be interested in this
topic because they may be Christians seeking to understand the
skating world and would generally agree with this authors perspective
on the topic. The author incorporates the following types of
evidence: his personal story. This evidence builds credibility
because he has directly experiences what he is saying and it has been
widely reported in the sport but its also limited because he is
biased by his experiences. Based on my opinion, experiences, and
research, I disagree with this author because I have never seen this
kind of underground culture. I think this article is important to
include in my essay because I believe its important to see an
opposite point of view.
This article is a credible source for
my research paper because it shows an all encompassing view of
skateboarding and its view in cities. he authors credentials include
many references and previously written volumes. Date wise this
publication is important to include because it shows recent facts
and absolute truths. The authors main goal in this article is to
inform about the facts and culture norms of skateboarding. The
publishing source for this article generally targets an audience that
fits the following description: anyone interested in insider
knowledge and experiences of a topic. This audience would be
interested in this topic because it shows clear facts. The author
incorporates the following types of evidence: court cases, laws and
stories. This evidence builds credibility because it is proven facts
and stories but its also limited because it doesn’t provided
opinions. Based on my opinion, experiences, and research, I agree
with this author because she simply states the facts. I think this
article is important to include in my essay because I believe its
important to see the facts.
This article is a credible source for
my research paper because it shows government and authoritative views
on skateboarding. The authors credentials include technology degree
and countless other journals. Date wise this publication is important
to include because it is very recent and will give the most recent
facts and information. The authors main goal in this article is to
inform the government and how it is reacting to skateboarders. The
publishing source for this article generally targets an audience that
fits the following description: anyone interested in media and higher
law and resistance to the skateboarding movement. This audience would
be interested in this topic because it provides very important
information on a prevalent local and federal government issue and
would generally agree with this authors perspective on the topic. The
author incorporates the following types of evidence: laws and facts.
This evidence builds credibility because it is clear and concise but
its also limited because it doesn’t provide opinions. Based on my
opinion, experiences, and research, I agree with this author because
there is nothing to disagree with. I think this article is important
to include in my essay because straight facts and laws are the basis
of the topic
Earlier this semester we learned three basic responses to ideas: agree, disagree, or both agree and disagree simultaneously. While these responses are helpful when you're learning to interact in academic conversations, these responses are a bit limited. You wrote in this post that "I agree with this author because there is nothing to disagree with," but I'd argue that agreement/disagreement isn't the only way to interact with someone's ideas. You can be surprised, frustrated, infuriated, or encouraged by the "facts" you're reading. So in that case, how would you respond to some of the content you've read?
ReplyDelete